Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Ratzinger flees sinking ship

And other shocking revelations that ought to come as no great surprise...

Maybe the pope really is quitting for health reasons. I mean, he’s looked like a sickly villain out of a Bond film from day one and hasn’t aged particularly gracefully since. Maybe what I took for nature taking its toll on his natural boyish glowering looks was actually evidence of a losing battle with ill-health.

But it still doesn’t pass the smell test because it’s the pope’s job to die in office. It’s like the last line of the Pope Contract. The job security on this gig makes Supreme Court justices look like migrant workers lined up outside a Home Depot.

The news reports all agree it’s been 600 years since a pope quit. Again, probably because all popes know that their last official act is supposed to be dying in office. Then with the mourning period, the conclave of cardinals, the white wisp of smoke… We’ve all read Dan Brown. We know how it works.

And popes milk their lifetime gigs. For 600 years now, not a one of them has said, “Gee, I’m getting a little long in the tooth. Maybe I should slow down and enjoy my golden years. Turn the store over to someone younger, with fresh ideas.”

So why did this pope break with tradition? The new plan still involves him dying on Vatican grounds, just at a cloistered nunnery within, instead of on the golden throne.

The question arises unbidden: What is the advantage of going from spiritual leader of umpteen million human beings and being one of the richest men in the world… to moving in with a bunch of sexually-repressed women who aren’t even allowed to speak? At a job where it’s part of your job description to get sick and die while in office anyhow?

I gotta think it’s the whole not-speaking part. The last thing I heard about this pope were allegations of his own first-hand complicity in shuffling suspect priests off to unsuspecting new communities in the pedophile scandal that I expect will ultimately financially destroy the Catholic church.

My suspicion is it’s more than Ratzinger not wanting to preside over the demise of the venerable institution; I think he doesn’t want to be the smoking gun that causes its extinction.

I can’t think of a better place to dodge both extradition and media attention than a cloistered nunnery on the grounds of the Vatican, officially its own country since 1929 when it was declared so by Benito Mussolini. (Yes, that Benito Mussolini.)

Out of the public eye, this pope is guaranteed to take any secrets he has with him to the grave. Out of the papacy, he won’t put a pope’s face on the public scandal that is convulsing the church.

Nicely played, sir.

But without trying to be unkind, if you absolutely had to put a face to a centuries-long pedophilia cover-up, you could do worse than this one:


1 Comments:

Blogger GlenT said...

Well played, and I happen to agree with you completely, both on the sinking ship analogy and the worthiness of this person to be the face of the destruction of the Catholic Church. His memo threatening excommunication to any who blew the whistle (if you'll pardon the phrase) on the pedophilia that was running rampant in the church pretty much ties him both to the purported acts, and the fact of the cover up.

3:27 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home